It is that the people playing the Missouri are more experienced players on average and are not playing a gimped version of the ship while grinding through it. The reason for the two week stat difference between Iowa and Missouri is obvious. How is that fair for the poor Iowa? Also, Missouri prints so much more credits than Iowa, why would you not pick the Missouri over the Iowa? Missouri gets RADAR but lose the so vital ability to mount the capault aircraft, while retaining same sigma 1.9, same reload 30s, same dispersion, same speed, same armour values and scheme, same AA and secondary battery, hp, rudder shift.Not ok imo No much differentiation these days aside from some armour thickness and AA values. All this to balance her around her unique feature, the Torpedoes. Kii has 1.7 sigma vs 1.8 on the Amagi has a tiny bit longer reload at 31s vs 30s some armour thickness differentiation, specially the turtleback.
Also has 1 less repair party and can't mount any catapult aircraft. So i noticed something while reading the stats of some premiums vs the tech tree versions of the same type and tier.įor example, Duke of York lose in RoF in "compensation" of gaining the Hydroacoustic search, 29,5s vs 25s on the King George V. I was remembering the so called "uniqueness" of premiums ships and WG saying that they want to bring something "different" while at the same time not making them op (thus making tech tree version inferior), blah, blah, blah.
0 kommentar(er)
